How stooopid are democrats?

LarreeMP3 · Joined: 12 Apr 2002 Posts: 1935

Presidential candidate Lieberman's new press secretary's name is...Gobush!

:aua

Rev9Volts · Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1327

i duno they got enough votes to control congress for about 40 years. roosevelt 2.5 terms, truman 1.5 terms, kennedy .5, johnson 1.5, carter 1, clinton 2. eisenhower 1 or 2, nixon 1.5, ford .5, reagan 2, bush 1, bush 1.

about 9 to 8 in last 17 elections. most all the governers in deep south since 1865 or so as well as those state legislatures.

personally when it comes to politics i think they are smarter.

besides liberman will never win. usa will not elect a jew any time soo i do not think, be it right or wrong. i think it hurt gore. there were even rumors clinton and clinton helped gore "decide" on liberman to help him lose so bush would win and make it easier for hillary to get in later.

LarreeMP3 · Joined: 12 Apr 2002 Posts: 1935

Problem is, there is no difference between democrats and republicans anymore. But I like President Bush. He reminds me of me. He pisses everybody off. I've never voted for a republican before. He has my vote in 2004!

Edited by: LarreeMP3 at: 7/11/03 1:01 am

Rev9Volts · Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1327

well you are right to a large extint. it was a funny joke. i think the democrats have better strategists, not necessarily the politicians. james carville is an ass, but very smart.

Edited by: Rev9Volts at: 7/11/03 1:55 pm

NRKofOver · Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 505

You know, if Bush pissed people off with intelligent, well thought-out actions, I might appreciate him more, but he's a moron. I can't be intrigued by a moron. Not that the Democrats have much more to offer, although compared to Bush, Clinton was an intellectual giant.

Read all about ME!

Rev9Volts · Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1327

perhaps although one does not have to be a genius to be atleast a decent president. just a good manager. the cabinet secretaries do all the work- (short explaination)

more importantly to me as "dubya" as in george "w" (pronounced "dubya" in texas and south) stack up against the man he ran against that being al gore?

"w" had a higher college grade point average than all gore.

"w" has a masters in business administratiion from harvard university and al gore flunked out of seminary (masters in theology) at vanderbuilt university.

LarreeMP3 · Joined: 12 Apr 2002 Posts: 1935

So if "W" did better in school than Gore, we are forking LUCKY that "W" won the 2000 presidential election. Imagine the mess we would be in today if professional dunce cap model algore had won the election?!?

:rollin

NRKofOver · Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 505

I've never been one to feel that the lesser of two evils is something to celebrate. It's entirely possible that we would be worse off with Al Gore, but that doesn't mean we're in good shape with Dubya. That's like saying I'd rather have Qadafi than Hussein run the country. Both suck.

Read all about ME!

LarreeMP3 · Joined: 12 Apr 2002 Posts: 1935

...I didn't vote for either one of them!

I voted Libertarian.

NRKofOver · Joined: 07 Sep 2002 Posts: 505

Holy @#%$! Larree and I have something in common!

Read all about ME!

debbie mannas · Joined: 30 Sep 2002 Posts: 1352

OTT, but hey...

www.concentric.net/~Tycho4/Main.htm

www.concentric.net/~Tycho4/main2.htm

:gl

Rev9Volts · Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1327

i read a bunch of thqat site and never could figure it out. i have never heard of it. i suspect there is a democrat doing it.

debbie mannas · Joined: 30 Sep 2002 Posts: 1352

its a bit OTT (over the top). So whats your opinion on the current republican administration?

(not that I think democrats are any better, with their lily livered convictionless opposition. gah).

Rev9Volts · Joined: 10 Jul 2003 Posts: 1327

i think they are too soft with the democrats. they cave into much. is the short answer.